- Thread Starter
- #141
Latest update:
Now we have X2 Toledo, SanDiego FX-55/FX-57, Dothan, at least one of each made to the list, ..., and a few Venice, San Diego, FX-55, Winchester, Prescott, ... to show the absolute computing power and the performance per clock of the various CPU type in a system perspective. Analysis should not be treated as final as sample size may not be large enough.
The 3rd column shows relative measure to Barton (100%) based on SuperPI 32M on CPU frequency.
It becomes apparent that clock for clock (would like to see more data points to further refine the numbers),
- San Diego performs better than ClawHammer (~4%)
- Venice performs better than Winchester (~4%)
- Venice performs better than NewCastle (~5%)
- ClawHammer performs better than NewCastle (~2%)
- various A64 perform better than Barton/Tbred B (13-24%)
- Barton performs better than Tbred B (~4+%)
etc.
Remark: Sample size may not be large enough and tests not controlled.
SuperPI 32M run time analysis has not been adjusted for variations such as OS, memory size, timing.
Watch how the yellow bar trending downwards in the last graph as performance clock for clock decreases.
For background and explanation of the analysis:
Analysis of different core performance in SuperPI 32M (post 308)
Now we have X2 Toledo, SanDiego FX-55/FX-57, Dothan, at least one of each made to the list, ..., and a few Venice, San Diego, FX-55, Winchester, Prescott, ... to show the absolute computing power and the performance per clock of the various CPU type in a system perspective. Analysis should not be treated as final as sample size may not be large enough.
The 3rd column shows relative measure to Barton (100%) based on SuperPI 32M on CPU frequency.
It becomes apparent that clock for clock (would like to see more data points to further refine the numbers),
- San Diego performs better than ClawHammer (~4%)
- Venice performs better than Winchester (~4%)
- Venice performs better than NewCastle (~5%)
- ClawHammer performs better than NewCastle (~2%)
- various A64 perform better than Barton/Tbred B (13-24%)
- Barton performs better than Tbred B (~4+%)
etc.
Remark: Sample size may not be large enough and tests not controlled.
SuperPI 32M run time analysis has not been adjusted for variations such as OS, memory size, timing.
Watch how the yellow bar trending downwards in the last graph as performance clock for clock decreases.
For background and explanation of the analysis:
Analysis of different core performance in SuperPI 32M (post 308)